Why SWFObject is better than AC_RunActiveContent.js for flash embedding
Some advantages of using SWFObject over Macromedia’s AC_RunActiveContent.js approach (that most places don’t talk about):
ACActiveX.js & ACRunActiveContent.js is for java app that detect my client mac address I have java application running on my computer. I've tested on several pc, sometimes it detect the mac address, but sometimes nothing came out. Descargar imgburn gratis. In createusers.php, somehow im not able to store the mac address into a variable.( var mac = getMacAddress; ). Does, I finally decided just to go ahead with ACRunActiveContent.js which I used in the first place. I don't seem to be able to find any usefullness using SWF Object. And btw, both static and dynamic method in SWF Object 2.1 triggered the activeX warning in IE 8. If you could fix that, I might consider.
Ac Runactivecontent Js Internet Explorer
- SWFObject degrades gracefully. If flash isn’t detected, the “flashcontent” div element never gets replaced with the flash object script. This being the case, you can use xhtml compliant code that’s far cleaner and more robust than anything Macromedia supports out of the box. Interestingly, Macromedia doesn’t even support alternative content when their implementation is called using the jscript. They allow a <noscript> content area, but in that case you’re limited to only having a replacement <img> instead of full-blown replacement content.
- SWFObject entails terser code. When using SFWObject, you’re only placing/calling your flash script once instead of multiple times. Notice, for example, that Macromedia requires the flash object to essentially be placed twice, thereby duplicating your work outright. Needless to say, SFWObject’s code implementation is far more elegant and much easier to maintain.
- SWFObject contains an efficient and robust framework that has extensive functionality built right in. As it stands, Macromedia’s implementation has no (or at least an extremely cryptic) method for doing things like, for example, passing flash argument variables. In fact, a quick glance at Macromedia’s AC_RunActiveContent.js file shows that their rendering mechanism is proprietary to the point of absurdity. Case in point, notice Macromedia’s AC_FL_RunContent() function for generating the <embed> object – if that’s not ad hoc, I don’t know what is. Dirty, cumbersome, and the perfect example of unnecessary overhead that bars anything from being readily transparent or extensible.
- And, of course, all of the regular advantages.
Some caveats:
- SWFObject doesn’t work if/when javascript is disabled. I personally consider this a small point, but it’s still a valid shortcoming. Of course, it seems to me that browsers that are running without javascript enabled are likely to be running without flash enabled, either; this is hardly the sort of crowd that most web applications (relying on flash, nonetheless) have to cater to. Incidentally, Macromedia’s approach doesn’t suffer this setback given their use of <noscript>.
EXAMPLE
Parts Manual for New Holland 450 Sickle Bar Mower. This Parts Manual contains 40 pages of helpful information. The manual is a digitally enhanced reproduction of the OEM manual and is bound for a lifetime of use. Buy New Holland 450 Sickle Bar Mower Operators Manual (SN# 2026 and UP): Tractors - Amazon.com FREE DELIVERY possible on eligible purchases. New Holland 450 455 Sickle Bar Mower Operators Manual Author: Jensales.com Subject: The New Holland Sickle Bar Mower Operators Manual (NH-O-450,455 ) fits the Ford New Holland 450, Ford New Holland 455. Always in stock so you can get it fast. Also available as a pdf download. Jensales offers the finest in Manuals, Parts, and Deca ls. New Holland 450 455 Sickle Bar Mower Parts Manual Author: Jensales.com Subject: The New Holland Sickle Bar Mower Parts Manual (NH-P-450,455 ) fits the Ford New Holland 450, Ford New Holland 455. Always in stock so you can get it fast. Also available as a pdf download. Jensales offers the finest in Manuals, Parts, and Decals. Nh 450 sickle bar mower manual.
Anyone familiar with Macromedia’s suggested method for deploying a flash component will find the following typical:
Using SWFObject, one can replace the above using about 1/4 the code:
Why SWFObject is better than AC_RunActiveContent.js for flash embedding
Some advantages of using SWFObject over Macromedia’s AC_RunActiveContent.js approach (that most places don’t talk about):
Get A Free Mac Laptop
- SWFObject degrades gracefully. If flash isn’t detected, the “flashcontent” div element never gets replaced with the flash object script. This being the case, you can use xhtml compliant code that’s far cleaner and more robust than anything Macromedia supports out of the box. Interestingly, Macromedia doesn’t even support alternative content when their implementation is called using the jscript. They allow a <noscript> content area, but in that case you’re limited to only having a replacement <img> instead of full-blown replacement content.
- SWFObject entails terser code. When using SFWObject, you’re only placing/calling your flash script once instead of multiple times. Notice, for example, that Macromedia requires the flash object to essentially be placed twice, thereby duplicating your work outright. Needless to say, SFWObject’s code implementation is far more elegant and much easier to maintain.
- SWFObject contains an efficient and robust framework that has extensive functionality built right in. As it stands, Macromedia’s implementation has no (or at least an extremely cryptic) method for doing things like, for example, passing flash argument variables. In fact, a quick glance at Macromedia’s AC_RunActiveContent.js file shows that their rendering mechanism is proprietary to the point of absurdity. Case in point, notice Macromedia’s AC_FL_RunContent() function for generating the <embed> object – if that’s not ad hoc, I don’t know what is. Dirty, cumbersome, and the perfect example of unnecessary overhead that bars anything from being readily transparent or extensible.
- And, of course, all of the regular advantages.
Some caveats:
- SWFObject doesn’t work if/when javascript is disabled. I personally consider this a small point, but it’s still a valid shortcoming. Of course, it seems to me that browsers that are running without javascript enabled are likely to be running without flash enabled, either; this is hardly the sort of crowd that most web applications (relying on flash, nonetheless) have to cater to. Incidentally, Macromedia’s approach doesn’t suffer this setback given their use of <noscript>.
EXAMPLE
ASTRA Z16XER 2007 VERSION NR: B 4 MOUNTING THE INLET MANIFOLD COUPLINGS Remove the inlet manifold, remove the plastic wiring duct ( not used again ). Drill 5 holes of 4,8 mm in the inlet manifold ( one for the overpressure coupling, see page 3 ). Tap M6x1 thread in these holes. Place the couplings with a lock compound in the inlet manifold. Jul 19, 2016 2009 MK5 Vauxhall Astra H 1.6 Petrol Manual Engine Z16XER 46,543 Miles parts4carsuk. Opel Astra Opel Astra was a small family car from Opel, the British subsidiary of Adam Opel AG. Since its release in 1979, it has evolved into six derivatives. Astra is a strong seller in UK, and second most popular family car in Britain. It has been also popular as a racing car, particularly in touring car racing. Astra H Vauxhall Workshop Manuals J Engine and Engine Aggregates Inspections Exhaust Emissions Test Adjustment data for Astra-H Z 16 XER (1.6 16V ECOTEC) 85 kW. Astra z16xer manual instructions. Astra H Vauxhall Workshop Manuals J Engine and Engine Aggregates Fuel Injection Systems Simtec 75 Technical Service Bulletins Warning Lights, Telltale Engine Z16XER, Coolant Temperatur Sensor - SVS on, P2182(17) set.
Anyone familiar with Macromedia’s suggested method for deploying a flash component will find the following typical:
Using SWFObject, one can replace the above using about 1/4 the code: